<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Data Circle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacircle.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacircle.org</link>
	<description>Technology news, tips and tricks</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Editing files over SSH in OS X by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2008/07/19/editing-files-over-ssh-in-os-x/#comment-129069</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacircle.org/?p=186#comment-129069</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure what you mean by the terminal - I start TextWrangler by clicking the icon in the dock, then open the file through the usual menus. I believe TextWrangler does come with some command line tools, but I've never used them directly from a terminal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you mean by the terminal &#8211; I start TextWrangler by clicking the icon in the dock, then open the file through the usual menus. I believe TextWrangler does come with some command line tools, but I&#8217;ve never used them directly from a terminal.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Editing files over SSH in OS X by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2008/07/19/editing-files-over-ssh-in-os-x/#comment-128403</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacircle.org/?p=186#comment-128403</guid>
		<description>How do you get the terminal to open the html file in TextWrangler?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How do you get the terminal to open the html file in TextWrangler?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 37signals waves goodbye to IE6 by Ozan's blog &#187; This blog is broken on IE6 and I don&#8217;t care</title>
		<link>http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2008/07/12/37signals-waves-goodbye-to-ie6/#comment-126011</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozan's blog &#187; This blog is broken on IE6 and I don&#8217;t care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacircle.org/?p=170#comment-126011</guid>
		<description>[...] On the other hand, supporting old IE versions isn&#8217;t entirely straightforward. They&#8217;re difficult to debug for (particularly on a mac) and standards non-compliance means that otherwise simple fixes become unpredictable. The expense was enough, for instance, for 37signals to cease supporting IE6. Furthermore, I believe that non-compliant browsers should be opposed as a matter of principle, as many others have argued before me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] On the other hand, supporting old IE versions isn&#8217;t entirely straightforward. They&#8217;re difficult to debug for (particularly on a mac) and standards non-compliance means that otherwise simple fixes become unpredictable. The expense was enough, for instance, for 37signals to cease supporting <span class="caps">IE6</span>. Furthermore, I believe that non-compliant browsers should be opposed as a matter of principle, as many others have argued before me. [...]</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Technology predictions for 2008 by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2007/12/28/technology-predictions-for-2008/#comment-107467</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2007/12/28/technology-predictions-for-2008/#comment-107467</guid>
		<description>Overtaking Vista is hardly an achievement though, as no one seems to be in a rush to upgrade from XP. Compared to the market share of Windows overall, Linux is pretty insignificant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Overtaking Vista is hardly an achievement though, as no one seems to be in a rush to upgrade from XP. Compared to the market share of Windows overall, Linux is pretty insignificant.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Technology predictions for 2008 by Tim Dobson</title>
		<link>http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2007/12/28/technology-predictions-for-2008/#comment-107342</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Dobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2007/12/28/technology-predictions-for-2008/#comment-107342</guid>
		<description>I think the idea that there will be a year of GNU/Linux on desktop is misguided.
The Percentage of GNU/Linux users in the desktop market grew last year by 0.5%. 
that's nothing you say.
Not quite. If GNU/Linux users were to grow at the same rate, it would not be long until vista had been left behind.
I don't think 2008 will be know as the year of GNU/Linux on desktop, because i think the idea that there is just one year is a myth. I suspect it will enter a golden age with increased publicity and adoption.
I *do* think some people will drop DRM. but sadly I think kangaroo will fail to make this a sound victory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think the idea that there will be a year of <span class="caps">GNU</span>/Linux on desktop is misguided.<br />
The Percentage of <span class="caps">GNU</span>/Linux users in the desktop market grew last year by 0.5%.<br />
that&#8217;s nothing you say.<br />
Not quite. If <span class="caps">GNU</span>/Linux users were to grow at the same rate, it would not be long until vista had been left behind.<br />
I don&#8217;t think 2008 will be know as the year of <span class="caps">GNU</span>/Linux on desktop, because i think the idea that there is just one year is a myth. I suspect it will enter a golden age with increased publicity and adoption.<br />
I <strong>do</strong> think some people will drop <span class="caps">DRM</span>. but sadly I think kangaroo will fail to make this a sound victory.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Royal Web 2.0 Christmas by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2007/12/24/royal-web-20-christmas/#comment-107074</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2007/12/24/royal-web-20-christmas/#comment-107074</guid>
		<description>I think I missed that news item about the Queen texting her message, though I'm not sure how that would work anyway given that you only have 160 characters for SMS. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think I missed that news item about the Queen texting her message, though I&#8217;m not sure how that would work anyway given that you only have 160 characters for <span class="caps">SMS</span>. <img src='http://www.datacircle.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Royal Web 2.0 Christmas by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2007/12/24/royal-web-20-christmas/#comment-106922</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2007/12/24/royal-web-20-christmas/#comment-106922</guid>
		<description>"I’m impressed that such an old and traditional institution as the Royal Family has finally grasped modern technology and used it in a simple but effective way."

Meh, there is something similar every year: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/uk/1707903.stm ;)

I found it useful to show my gran after the event she missed. So yay for that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m impressed that such an old and traditional institution as the Royal Family has finally grasped modern technology and used it in a simple but effective way.&#8221;</p>

	<p>Meh, there is something similar every year: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/uk/1707903.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/uk/1707903.stm</a> <img src='http://www.datacircle.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

	<p>I found it useful to show my gran after the event she missed. So yay for that</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Support for PHP 4 to be dropped by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2007/07/14/support-for-php-4-to-be-dropped/#comment-92840</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2007/07/14/support-for-php-4-to-be-dropped/#comment-92840</guid>
		<description>That is quite aggressive, although personally I push people to always upgrade to the latest stable version of any piece of software (unless there's a serious backwards-compatibility issue) because most releases fix important bugs or security holes. I suppose if you're going to upgrade from PHP 4 to PHP 5 you might as well go for 5.2 anyway (I can't seriously see many people going from the latest 4.x release to something like 5.0.2).

BTW, that's a very nice portfolio site you have there. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That is quite aggressive, although personally I push people to always upgrade to the latest stable version of any piece of software (unless there&#8217;s a serious backwards-compatibility issue) because most releases fix important bugs or security holes. I suppose if you&#8217;re going to upgrade from <span class="caps">PHP 4</span> to <span class="caps">PHP 5</span> you might as well go for 5.2 anyway (I can&#8217;t seriously see many people going from the latest 4.x release to something like 5.0.2).</p>

	<p><span class="caps">BTW</span>, that&#8217;s a very nice portfolio site you have there. <img src='http://www.datacircle.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Support for PHP 4 to be dropped by David Strauss</title>
		<link>http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2007/07/14/support-for-php-4-to-be-dropped/#comment-92714</link>
		<dc:creator>David Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2007/07/14/support-for-php-4-to-be-dropped/#comment-92714</guid>
		<description>GoPHP5 supports dropping support for anything less than PHP 5.2. That's quite a bit more aggressive than PHP itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>GoPHP5 supports dropping support for anything less than <span class="caps">PHP 5</span>.2. That&#8217;s quite a bit more aggressive than <span class="caps">PHP</span> itself.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Smash my PS3 by Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.datacircle.org/archives/2006/11/21/smash-my-ps3/#comment-92032</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datacircle.org/archives/2006/11/21/smash-my-ps3/#comment-92032</guid>
		<description>Awww no:( that really hurt to watch. I cant belive it either, what morons!

&lt;a href="http://www.consoleauction.co.uk/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Matt&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Awww no:( that really hurt to watch. I cant belive it either, what morons!</p>

	<p><a href="http://www.consoleauction.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">Matt</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
